Smart Ring Showdown: Which One Reigns Supreme?

The Great Smart Ring Rumble: Unveiling the King of Wearables (and the Contenders)

Smart rings are having a moment. After years in the niche gadget realm, they’re finally gaining mainstream appeal. Thanks to advancements in technology, they’re now thinner, more accurate, and more comfortable than ever before. For some, they offer a compelling alternative to the ubiquitous smartwatch. While smartwatches dominate the wearable market, their limitations – bulkiness, daily charging requirements, and incompatibility with certain activities or wrist conditions – make them unsuitable for everyone. Conversely, smart rings provide a discreet, often multi-day battery life solution, with fingers offering a potentially more accurate location for tracking heart rate data. But with a growing number of options flooding the market, choosing the right smart ring can be a daunting task. To cut through the noise, I meticulously tested six leading contenders: the Oura Ring, Ultrahuman Ring Air, Circular Slim, Samsung Galaxy Ring, RingConn, and Evie Ring. My quest? To crown the ultimate smart ring champion.

Accuracy: The Non-Negotiable Feature

Let’s address the elephant in the room: accuracy. The Circular Slim, priced at $294, initially promised much but delivered little. While its metrics were generally acceptable, its step counting was frequently wildly inaccurate—off by a staggering 5,000 steps compared to other wearables. This was compounded by an agonizingly slow syncing process –two to three minutes per sync, frequently prompting me to abandon the frustrating endeavor. For a device primarily marketed for health tracking, such significant inaccuracies are simply unacceptable. Beyond the accuracy issues, the app experience was equally disappointing; the ambitious AI chatbot, for instance, required a 14-day calibration period and offered little practical value even afterwards. The charger itself, a easily-misplaced USB stick, added to the frustration. While the promised vibration motor for silent alarms was functional, the requirement of tapping the ring twice (in the dark, a nigh-impossible task) made it more of an annoyance than a helpful feature. The ring’s construction also felt cheap, giving it a disappointing feel for its premium price point. This lack of precision and polish ultimately led to its early elimination from the competition.

Eliminated: Circular Ring

Design and Polish: A Necessary Balancing Act

Next up was the $269 Evie Ring. Aesthetically, it’s a standout, boasting an elegant open-gap design. This clever design ensures comfortable wear regardless of finger size or swelling, a significant advantage. If comfort and style were king, it would have been a clear victor. However, it’s clear this is a first-generation product, hampered by the usual first-gen growing pains. While functionality is decent, there’s a definite lack of overall polish. Syncing and firmware updates were noticeably slow, and the app’s presentation and contextualization of data lacked refinement, although the company has made improvements since initial release. This ring shows great potential, but it needs further refinement to truly compete with the established players.

"Being ‘fine’ isn’t enough" – this aptly summarizes the $279 RingConn’s performance. While unremarkable in most ways, its greatest strength is its battery life; six to nine days on a single charge, outperforming every other ring tested, along with the inclusion of a convenient charging case. However its performance is consistently “fine” to “acceptable” in all other areas. However, this middling performance isn’t enough to secure a top spot in a field of increasingly sophisticated contenders. Its slightly squarish shape, while not a dealbreaker, felt somewhat less comfortable compared to the others.

Standalone Performance: The Key Differentiator

The $400 Samsung Galaxy Ring, possessing sleek hardware and comfortable design, demonstrated remarkable elegance. However, its reliance on the wider Samsung ecosystem hobbles its standalone capabilities. While the device had the slimmest profile and, aside from the Evie Ring, was the most comfortable, its full potential is only unlocked with a Samsung Galaxy Watch. Similarly, the desirable double-pinch gesture to manage notifications and camera functions requires a Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 or Z Fold 6. This tight coupling to a limited set of Samsung products holds it back from its potential to become a truly standalone player.

Specialized Focus: A Double-Edged Sword

The $349 Ultrahuman Ring Air proved to be a serious contender. Its sleek design earned compliments, and while its battery life wasn’t exceptional (three to four days), its fitness tracking and training capabilities were superior. Its clear focus on athletically-focused improvement and training optimization is something many competitors lack. Unlike the more general wellness focus of Oura, Ultrahuman’s app specifically emphasizes performance enhancement strategies — such as providing detailed information on the recommended caffeine intake based on workout goals. However, the accuracy of metrics generated had some minor concerns; the ring’s analysis of my VO2 Max and resting heart rate was significantly more generous than other devices I have tracked with over several years. Although this might encourage some, the very optimistic portrayal of results could be a cause for concern for others seeking a more balanced and realistic analysis of their data. The addition of optional "Power Plugs" for features like AFib detection, for an additional monthly cost, added a further subscription layer to this experience.

Eliminated: Ultrahuman Ring Air

The Reigning Champion: The Oura Ring

Even with the challenge of five strong competitors, the $299 Oura Ring retains its crown. This is a testament to its continued refinement over many years. While individual competitors might excel in a few specific areas, the Oura Ring provides a comprehensive and consistently high-quality experience across the board. It’s worth noting that the several competitors in this review highlighted the flaws in the Oura’s features, which spurred the company’s response and development of additional features. Oura demonstrated excellence in accuracy, with a reliably polished app and seamless syncing. Its extensive data validation and research collaborations underpin its reputation for accurate and meaningful health data. The main drawbacks are the $6 monthly subscription fee and the less-than-ideal charging dock.

Smart rings are not yet ready to topple smartwatches. Their higher price point for often more limited functionality makes them a specific niche; for an average consumer, a smartwatch offers more bang for the buck. However, if you are going to buy a smart ring, the Oura Ring remains king, demonstrating a superior and consistently reliable experience that is hard to beat. Five other rings put up a good fight – some excelling in certain aspects – but even the best contenders still fall short of the total experience and refinement of the Oura Ring. Whether or not this will change in the future remains to be seen, but as of today, Oura holds its position and has set the gold standard to aspire to.

Article Reference