Anonymous App’s Silence: Did FTC Oversight Fail to Stop Cyberbullying?

The FTC Cracks Down on NGL: A Case Study in Protecting Kids Online

The internet has become an integral part of modern life, especially for young people. However, the digital world also presents unique challenges, with issues like cyberbullying, privacy violations, and exploitation posing serious threats to children. Amidst this complex landscape, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is taking a proactive stance in protecting children by cracking down on companies that violate their privacy or otherwise harm them online.

One recent example of the FTC’s assertive approach is the settlement agreement reached with NGL, an anonymous messaging app popular among teenagers. The agreement, still subject to judicial approval, represents a significant departure from previous settlements, going beyond financial penalties to ban NGL from offering its app to children under 13.

NGL’s Rise and Fall

NGL gained traction as a platform for teenagers seeking anonymous messages and questions from their peers. Its appeal lay in its promise of offering a platform to express oneself freely without fear of judgment. However, as the app gained popularity, concerns about its safety and practices began to surface.

The FTC and the Los Angeles District Attorney’s office launched an investigation into NGL alleging several violations of federal and state laws. The investigation highlighted a disturbing pattern of deceptive practices:

• Deceptive Marketing: NGL was accused of employing manipulative tactics to entice users into subscribing to its paid version. The complaint alleged that NGL generated fake messages, making them appear as if they were from real individuals, while falsely promising that subscription would reveal the senders’ identities. However, users subscribing for up to $9.99 per week received only vague hints about the senders, sparking complaints and accusations of deception.
• Failed Cyberbullying Protection: NGL promoted its app as a "fun yet safe place" for young users, claiming to employ artificial intelligence to filter out harmful content and cyberbullying. The investigation revealed a stark contrast between these claims and the reality on the platform. The investigators found that cyberbullying was rampant, with numerous complaints from users citing self-harm and suicide attempts triggered by negative interactions on NGL.
• Privacy Violations: The investigation also uncovered violations of the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA). NGL failed to obtain parental consent for users under 13, a legal requirement for collecting and handling children’s data. Their data protection practices were also found to be lacking, as they failed to honor requests from parents to delete their children’s data.

A Banning Order: A New Era for Children’s Online Safety?

The settlement agreement with NGL is noteworthy because it goes beyond previous settlements focused primarily on financial penalties. Along with the $5 million penalty, the FTC imposed a significant condition: NGL is barred from offering its app to children under 13. This precedent-setting move represents a significant step forward in protecting children online.

While NGL’s co-founder Joao Figueiredo stated they view the settlement as an opportunity for improvement, the company’s actions and the extensive allegations raise serious questions about their commitment to ethical practices and child safety.

Divergent Views on the FTC’s Approach

The FTC’s unanimous decision to pursue the complaint highlights the agency’s commitment to protecting children. However, the Republican commissioners, while supporting the complaint against NGL, expressed concerns about the potential of the FTC Act being used to ban any anonymous messaging app marketed to teenagers.

Commissioner Andrew Ferguson argued that a categorical ban on anonymous messaging apps could pose significant constitutional challenges. He acknowledged that teenagers benefit from online anonymity, citing its role in protecting them against "cancel culture" and facilitating discussions about sensitive topics. He further emphasized the potential of anonymity to encourage vulnerable teenagers to seek help when they might otherwise hesitate.

The Significance of the Ban

The case against NGL is significant for several reasons:

• A Shift in the Landscape: This case marks a significant shift in the FTC’s approach to online platforms catering to children. The ban on NGL’s services for under-13 users sets a precedent for holding companies accountable for violating children’s privacy and safety. It signals a tougher stance by the FTC in safeguarding children in the online world.
• A Call for Industry-Wide Change: The case could spur other social media platforms to rethink their practices and prioritize child safety. It serves as a warning to companies that they must adhere to strict regulations and ethical standards in targeting and serving young users.
• A Stepping Stone for Further Regulations: The case underscores the need for comprehensive legislation and policies to protect children online, including robust age verification mechanisms and stricter regulations on data collection and use.

The Future of Online Safety for Kids

The NGL case is a complex and multifaceted one, highlighting the delicate balance between fostering online freedom and safeguarding children from exploitation and harm. It serves as a stark reminder that the digital landscape holds both enormous potential and significant risks for young users.

As technology continues to evolve, so too must the regulatory framework that governs its use. The FTC’s actions against NGL signal a renewed focus on protecting children online, but it requires a collaborative effort from government agencies, technology companies, and parents to create a safer and more responsible online environment for young people.

The Road Ahead

The NGL settlement represents a pivotal moment in the ongoing struggle to ensure a safer online environment for children. While the debate surrounding the application of the FTC Act and the role of anonymity for teenagers may continue, it is undeniable that protecting children online requires a proactive and comprehensive approach.

The FTC’s actions in the NGL case may prompt further scrutiny of similar platforms and applications targeting young users, potentially ushering in a new era of accountability and stricter regulations. The focus on safeguarding children online is paramount, demanding collaborative efforts to ensure a future where young people can utilize the internet safely and responsibly.

Article Reference